It is important to look at the Earth in its context as only one of the nine planets which make up the solar system.
This is an introduction to the Solar System, its formation, and composition, with special emphasis on the "terrestrial" or "inner" planets. I take a kind of historical approach, noting the patterns and regularities observed, for example, by Tycho Brahe, described by Johannes Kepler, and explained by Sir Isaac Newton. Laplace and even the philosopher Immanuel Kant figure into shaping our modern-day notions of the origin and composition of the solar system.
"Early attempts to explain the origin of this system include the nebular hypothesis of the German philosopher Immanuel Kant and the French astronomer and mathematician Pierre Simon de Laplace, according to which a cloud of gas broke into rings that condensed to form planets." - Encarta, http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557663/Solar_System.html
Let's start by looking at some patterns in the solar system:
Taking the point of view of a first-time visitor, one of the first things you would notice about the Solar System is that the spacing between the planets' orbits consistently increases as you move away from the Sun (with one exception). Furthermore, it's not a linear increase, so we need essentially two figures, at different scales, to represent the solar system (pictures courtesy of "The Nine Planets"):


Titius-Bode's law: Distance, r, of the nth planet from the Sun (in A.U.s) is given by:
rn = 0.4 + 0.3 x 2n
| Planet | n | rn | Actual |
| Mercury | -infinity, -1 | 0.4, 0.55 | 0.39 |
| Venus | 0 | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| Earth | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Mars | 2 | 1.6 | 1.52 |
| Asteroids | 3 | 2.8 | - |
| Jupiter | 4 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Saturn | 5 | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Uranus | 6 | 19.6 | 19.2 |
| Neptune | 7 | 38.8 | 30.1 |
| Pluto | 8 | 77.2 | 39.4 |
All of the planets have nearly circular orbits around the sun.
All of the planets orbit the sun in a counterclockwise direction when viewed from the "North."
All but two of the planets spin on their own axes in a counterclockwise direction.
The sun spins on its own axis in a counterclockwise direction.

An object bigger than Pluto has been found in the outer solar system by Mike Brown (Caltech), Chad Trujillo (Gemini Observatory), and David Rabinowitz (Yale University). It is possible, perhaps likely, that it will eventually be considered to be our solar system's tenth planet. For more info, see NASA's press release and the discoverer's web site. Its temporary designation is 2003UB313; an official name will be given in due course (more). Brown et al have now also spotted a moon orbiting this object.
IODP Drillhole




![]() |
si·de·re·al [sahy-deer-ee-uhl] adjective 1. determined by or from the stars: sidereal time. 2. of or pertaining to the stars. |

"Jupiter is so big that all the other planets in our Solar System could fit inside Jupiter (if it were hollow). "

Danish astronomer, Brahe’s assistant
Developed Kepler’s 3 laws:
LAW 1: The orbit of a planet/comet
about the Sun is an ellipse with the Sun's center of mass at one focus

This is the equation for an ellipse:
![]()
LAW 2: A line joining a planet/comet and the Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal intervals of time

LAW 3: The squares of the periods of the planets are proportional to the cubes of their semimajor axes:

From Kepler’s laws (not an apple) Newton conceived of Universal Law of Gravitation:

For example, consider planet in circular orbit around Sun:

(Equation 1
From Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation, it would seem apparent that we could find the mass of the Earth. Take M to be Earth's mass, and m to be a "test mass." Since F = ma, we can divide both sides of the equation below by m to get the acceleration of gravity, ag:

Assuming our test mass is at the surface of the Earth, r is the radius of the Earth. In 200 B.C., Eratosthenes used shadows of a vertical stick at two different latitudes to determine that the radius of the Earth was 250,000 stadia. Unfortunately, we do not know which one of the various measurements used in antiquity is represented by the stadia of Eratosthenes. According to the researches of Lepsius, however, the stadium in question represented 180 meters, giving a radius of the Earth of 7,160 km. Today we know the mean radius of the Earth is roughly 6,371 km. Measuring the acceleration of an object just requires accurate measure of time (Galileo used water clocks). [Galileo and the Leaning Tower of Pisa] So, we can find GM, but not M independently!
Henry Cavendish (1731-1810)

[How were the masses of the spheres determined?] It was not until Cavendish determined that G had a value of 6.75 x 10-11 N m2/kg2 that the mass of the Earth was known! Today, the currently accepted value of G is 6.67259 x 10-11 N m2/kg2. And this results, as you will show in homework, in:
![]()
This is perhaps the most important constraint on the composition of the Earth. Any model for the composition and structure of the Earth must result in this mass. Is the Earth made of green cheese? Well, does (density of green cheese) x (volume of Earth) = M??
Once the mass of the Earth was established, its bulk, or average, density could be determined:

We know that the average density of continental crust is about 2670 kg/m3 and the average density of oceanic crust is about 3000 kg/m3 . Furthermore, from meteorites, among other things, we know the density of mantle material (peridotite) is about 3300 kg/m3. This would seem to suggest that the deeper interior of the Earth must have a very great density if the average is to be 5540 kg/m3. However, this density cannot be used to compare with the previously mentioned densities because they are measured at STP. The Earth's bulk density is "inflated" because of the tremendous pressures in the interior of the Earth. Although we will discuss later how it is done, the uncompressed bulk density of the Earth is about 4000 kg/m3. Still, the argument holds that the interior of the Earth must have a density significantly higher than mantle density.
By observing the orbital radius and period of a natural or artificial satellite about a planet, its mass can be determined. Its radius is determined by astronomical observation. Once the mass and radius of a planet are determined, bulk density can be estimated:
| Planet | r (kg/m3) | ru (kg/m3) |
| Mercury | 5420 | 5300 |
| Venus | 5250 | 3900 |
| Earth | 5520 | 4000 |
| (Moon) | 3340 | 3340 |
| Mars | 3940 | 3700 |
| (Asteroids) | 3710 | 3710 |
| Jupiter | 1310 | N.A. |
| Saturn | 690 | N.A. |
| Uranus | 1190 | N.A. |
| Neptune | 1660 | N.A. |
| Pluto | 2080(?) | ? |
Jupiter has 4 major (Galilean) satellites; this multi-satellite system has been referred to as a "mini solar system"
| Galilean Moon | r | 103 km from Jupiter | Moon radius |
| Io | 3570 | 421 | 1,815 |
| Europa | 2967 | 671 | 1,569 |
| Ganymede | 1940 | 1,070 | 2,631 |
| Callisto | 1865 | 1,883 | 2,400 |


Energy received by a planet is proportional to cross-sectional area of
planet, pR2:

As a result of Ercv, planet heats up and re-radiates energy; reaches steady state (heat received equals heat radiated, Erad). Now, let's assume planets re-radiate that energy over their entire surface (because they are rotating, entire surface "shares" this energy, and that planets can be assumed to be perfect black-body-radiators.
Black-body Radiator: idealized surface for which relationship between T and
radiated energy may be derived from thermodynamic (statistical mechanics) first
principles:![]() |
The total surface of a planet is
so
total radiated energy is:
![]()
Setting received and radiated energies equal:

Example: Earth - r = 149.6 x 106 km = 1.496 x 1011 m so T = 278o K = 5o C (very close)
| Actual Temperatures (oK) | Calculated | |||
| Planet | Day | Night | Mean | |
| Mercury | 700 | 100 | 452 | 444 |
| Venus | 721-731 | 732 | 730 | 323 |
| Earth | 277-310 | 260-283 | 281 | 278 |
| Moon | 380 | 100 | 280 | 278 |
| Mars | 240 | 190 | 215 | 223 |
| Jupiter | 120-150 | - | 120 | 121 |
| Saturn | 120-160 | - | 88 | 90 |
| Uranus | 50-110 | - | 59 | 63 |
| Neptune | 50-110 | - | 48 | 50 |
| Pluto | - | - | 37 | 44 |
For more information, see this site and this one

|
"Linear" vs. Rotational Mechanics |
|


| Ideal Body (in order of increasing central concentration) | I, moment of inertia |
| planet, mass m, in orbit of radius r | 1.0 mr2 |
| ring, radius R, mass m, spinning about sym. axis | 1.0 mR2 |
| hollow sphere, radius R | 2/3 mR2 |
| homogeneous sphere, radius R | 2/5 mR2 |
| sphere, core radius 1/2R, core density = 2 x mantle density | 0.367 mR2 |
| mass concentrated on axis | 0.0 mR2 |

Animation of Precession of Equinoxes


![]()
| Body | I/mr2 |
| Moon | 0.391 |
| Mars | 0.365 |
| Earth | 0.3307 |
| Neptune | 0.29 |
| Jupiter | 0.26 |
| Uranus | 0.23 |
| Saturn | 0.20 |
| Sun | 0.06 |
Copyright J. L. Ahern 2007